- Task Graph
Apparently the form questions is resolved together with execution was around feedback. If the RFC feel arranged to have talk on TechCom?
Evidently the shape inquiries is resolved additionally the implementation is actually under feedback. Should the RFC end up being scheduled to own conversation at TechCom?
- The fresh new suggestion in the activity dysfunction is quite different from what has been followed. Because of it to succeed due to the fact a keen RFC, the job description should be updated to help you mirror that which we already are considering.
- We do not determine if this will be advised purely just like the a 3rd class function, and for implementation to your WMF options. In case it is for 3rd functions, it might not also you need a keen RFC, and may possibly be performed because an expansion too. When it is to have WMF creation, we will see to look very closely towards effects to possess caching and efficiency.
Seemingly the form questions try resolved as well as the execution are around feedback. If the RFC getting arranged to own discussion on TechCom?
- The proposition in the activity malfunction is quite distinct from just what has been adopted. For this to advance because the an RFC, work malfunction should be up-to-date so you’re able to echo that which we are generally looking at.
- We don’t determine if this is exactly proposed strictly just like the a third team element, or for deployment into WMF possibilities. If it is for third events, it might not even you prefer a keen RFC, and can even maybe be performed as the an expansion also. If it is to possess WMF development, we will have to appear very closely into effects for caching and you may show.
W.r.t. #step 1 – The shape has actually in reality advanced while we works which have for the section point even more practical and user friendly. We are able to enhance the breakdown in the RFC. #dos – Does “deployment on WMF assistance” suggest and then make which section of MediaWiki center app? I think this has been the brand new presumption, for this reason it has got been through of several iterations out-of framework, i18n and you will perf upgrade 🙂 Could WMF members of the family chime directly into confirm this might be however the newest instance?
#2 – Do “implementation toward WMF options” mean and also make that it element of MediaWiki center application? I do believe this has been new presumption, this is exactly why this has gone through of a lot iterations from design, i18n and perf update 🙂 Could WMF nearest and dearest chime directly into show it is nonetheless this new situation?
It means helping they toward no less than some of the WMF sites. Whether it’s part of center otherwise an extension isn’t very associated. The initial RFC might have been filed to the concept of which have which allowed on Wikipedia and family relations, but I want to provides explicit term thereon about relevant WMF anyone.
- Do not determine if this is suggested strictly as a 3rd people ability, and for deployment on WMF solutions. If it’s for 3rd people, it might not actually you would like an enthusiastic RFC, and may even perhaps be performed due to the beste katholieke dating apps fact an expansion also. In case it is getting WMF manufacturing, we will see to look very closely to the ramifications having caching and you will performance.